lasaslawyers.blogg.se

Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016
Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016







yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016
  1. #Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016 code#
  2. #Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016 plus#

#Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016 code#

The only utility for these extra channels that I can think of is an easy channel switch with a privacy code in place without the need to play around with the MENU button to reset CTCSS or DCS codes.

#Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016 plus#

With respect to the “extra” channels 23-42, these seem to be simply fixed combinations of a GMRS channel plus a CTCSS frequency. My guess is that the 900s would have continued to provide clear transmission/reception for at least 1 mile. In contrast, the 910s continued to provide clear reception. At just beyond 3/4 mile, the 710s began to breakup, and at 7/8 mile, breakup was so severe that it was essentially impossible to decipher the transmission.

yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016

The reception was equivalent for the 710s and the 900s for 12 blocks (3/4 mile) – the signals were identically strong with no breakup, although the audio (clarity) of the 900s was superior. I communicated with my wife every 2 blocks (1/8 mile) while walking south (surrounded by many highrise buildings). All four radios contained freshly charged BATT-5R batteries. By the way, the 710s were on Channel 20 and the 900s were on Channel 22 – both channels were clear. I then took the matching 710 and 900 down to the street and began walking south. I placed one 710 and one 900 next to a large picture window on the 13th floor of a highrise building in Manhattan. Whether one plans to use them all is a personal decision.īecause of the intense discussion about the possibly greater listed RF output for the 900s, I conducted a rough field test to determine whether there was a difference between the 710s and 900s. The radios themselves have all the “bells and whistles” as advertised, and these work well. The radios now fit properly and can be inserted and withdrawn easily, without adversely affecting the electrical contacts. I eliminated this issue by grinding off the tabs with a Dremel tool. This is the result of two small tabs in each of the 2 charging compartments, which are designed to hold the radios in place – a great idea if you plan to mount the charger upside down. Obviously, this translates to excessive holding power by the charger, and withdrawing the radios requires grasping the charger with one hand or the entire charger/radio combination will be pulled up. The new charger for the 900s provides a VERY tight fit for the radios, and insertion requires lots of push power. The batteries are Midland-supplied rechargables that are identical to those in the 710s (Type BATT-5R), but the chargers are different. The radios come with a pair of headsets, a charger and two batteries, and a car charger cord. The 900s are redesigned radios, which are larger than the 710s and have a few new external features (for example, different battery compartment cover closure, waterproof rubber cover for mic and phone jacks, different shaped keypads). The 900s are not simply 710s with updated circuitry. Here are my initial impressions and observations. I just received a pair of Midland GXT900s to replace a pair of GXT710s.









Yeh hai mohabbatein 13th october 2016